assignments/labs

Lab Assignments

Summary

These assignments are intended to fulfill the course goal:

  • Evaluate and critically assess digital methodologies and tools through hands-on technical experimentation and skillbuilding

These assignments will not be graded for content or completion; rather, they will make up a good portion of our class time, and can be worked on individually or as a group. If you must miss class for any reason, you can refer back to these assignments later if you so wish.

Week 3: Crowdsourced history via Zooniverse + LOC: By the People

As we’ll talk a lot about this semester, digitization is not a panacea, and it takes a lot of labor and time to turn a historical document into something that can be easily and quickly used by a researcher online. Scanned items that are printed can be processed with Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software like Abbyy Fine Reader, Adobe Acrobat Pro, or Tesseract OCR in order to create an approximation of what their contents say, which can then be searched, sorted, or edited. Hand-written, torn/damaged, or otherwise non-standardized printed items are much harder to make readable and often require humans to do this work (although HTR software is being developed, it will be a while before it’s very accurate). As you know, many organizations don’t employ people to do this work; instead, they rely on crowdsourced transcription, tagging, editing, and other functions to make the contents of these objects more accessible. Project Zooniverse and the Library of Congress’ By the People are two major initiatives in this vein with simple user interfaces and large, involved communities of volunteers. This can be laudable work when not exploitative of labor, so you’ll be dipping your toes into one of these platforms to get an idea of the amount of work that goes into the process.

To complete this assignment:

1. Browse the open projects at By the People and Project Zooniverse and identify one to which you’d like to contribute. Sign up for an account at the platform of your choice.

2. Take some time to review the platform’s standards and any directions specific to your project; By the People has a welcome guide. Zooniverse’s projects have their own directions and sometimes tutorials to walk through (an example here).

3. Decide ahead of time how many hours you’re going to put into this work! The time can fly by or feel like molasses, so it’s a good idea to have a benchmark before you go in. This work is not always very intellectually-stimulating. Get up and take breaks! Drink some water! I’d like for you to spend at least two hours reviewing how-to information and working on your chosen project for this assignment, but I leave that on the honor system.

4. As you work through this assignment, consider:

What are the pros and cons of crowdsourced data work like these initiatives? Did you learn anything new while working on your project? What can you glean about the project’s standards for ensuring accuracy, consistency, and attribution of labor?

Week 4: Textual analysis with Voyant Tools

Voyant Tools is a browser-based environment for analyzing digital texts. The tools provide a fast and comparatively easy way to look at a text or a corpus (collection, pl: corpora) of texts at different angles, which can reveal interesting patterns that would be hard to see otherwise.

Preparation: Voyant comes with two demo corpora: 8 of the works of Jane Austen, and 37 of William Shakespeare’s plays. You can play around with those, but for the purposes of this assignment we’ll be uploading a corpus of our own. Because it’s a web-based tool, using extremely large collections of texts can make it slow and laggy, so keep this in mind as you consider what you want to analyze. Voyant will detect the content from the following file formats: HTML, MS Word, MS Excel, ODT, Pages (Apple), PDF, plain text (.txt), RTF, and XML.

To complete this assignment:

1. You may make your own corpus by collecting together a number of related items that consist primarily of blocks of text (1940s cookbooks, motorcycle manuals, whatever — just be sure they’ve been scanned in and test that they contain a text transcription by trying to search them for a word like “and”). Or you may use the corpus I’ve provided as a downloadable ZIP file which is a collection of Camp Fire Girls manuals from 1913-1931, sourced from HathiTrust.

2. Upload your files into the Voyant Tools interface (select more than one item to upload by holding down Ctrl [on Windows] or Command [on Mac] as you select them) and wait a little bit for them to load.

3. Explore your results! For guidance on what you’re looking at, see the video below, or the really helpful documentation.

4. As you work through this assignment, consider:

Where did your data come from? Why did you choose to analyze it with this method? What did you want to find out from the data? What did you actually find out? What would you do differently next time? [Insert any other insights, too]

Video mini-tutorial: https://www.loom.com/share/df751f5738e045a9a21cedacc20301bd

Another video overview: (Via the recently departed DH legend, Stefan Sinclair)

Week 6: Visualizing data meaningfully with Datawrapper

There are many, many different tools out there to help you visualize data into charts and graphs. This week in class, we’ll work through a tutorial designed to be used with a specific tool called Datawrapper. Datawrapper was created with journalists in mind. It has a free, browser-based, intuitive interface, and offers a lot of options making it easier to contextualize your charts with explanatory text and/or annotations.

How this will work: You’ll all get a yellow sticky note as we begin the tutorial. If you have are confused about anything, having computer trouble, or your screen doesn’t match the one I’m projecting, stick that sticky note onto your computer so that I have a visual cue letting me know if I need to slow down or troubleshoot. Once no yellow sticky notes remain, we’ll move onto the next step in the tutorial.

As we walk through the steps together in class, please remember to be patient and generous with your classmates. Even if you’re finished with a step, please don’t skip ahead in the tutorial for now. You’ll have a chance to work at your own pace on your own chart after we finish the initial tutorial.

Preparation: Our tutorial is sourced from Hands on Data Visualization by Jack Dougherty and Ilya Ilyanku. We’ll be tackling chapter 6 on charting data. There’s a lot more to this book, specifically relating to sourcing and cleaning up data that you want to use. For the purposes of this tutorial, though, we’ll be using pre-packaged data.

To complete this assignment:

Part I

Take some time to look over the chart types listed in Table 6.1 of the tutorial. Which are you most familiar with? Which are the “easiest” for you to read or understand? Have you come across similar charts within your own research, and were they helpful?

We’ll be creating an annotated line chart in Datawrapper. Line charts are pretty useful for showing continuous data and revealing change over time. I will keep the tutorial open on the overhead screen as we walk through the tutorial, but if it’s probably not a bad idea to have it open in a tab on your computer: Walkthrough: Annotated Charts in Datawrapper.

When we’ve finished the tutorial, follow my instructions to export and upload your chart to our shared Google Drive or email it to me.

Part II

We’ll talk briefly about elements of design in data visualization, following along with the Chart Design Principles section of our tutorial. Now you’ll have a chance to create your own data visualization, drawing on these design principles to keep help ensure they’re accessible, clearly marked, and easy to interpret.

We’ll use the FRED Unemployment data again. This time, choose a date range that interests you (note that this data only goes back to 1948) and download that data from the site in CSV format. Going through the steps of the tutorial again, mark up the chart with annotations, labels, and highlights of your choice in order to give some historical context to the data. Use the yellow sticky again if you need it, but this exercise will proceed at everyone’s own pace. If we have time, we’ll workshop these charts.

Recorded lab session: https://temple.zoom.us/rec/share/GTlUNBdNYlHbvgYDDADqiSPwRDT5jzT-48ywaoarsM8yq6ZKuhha7kjneMPBZQQO.8WXgMeHrbFKgX9_C?startTime=1632776403000

Week 7: Building an undirected network graph with Palladio

We’re working with Palladio, a browser-based application for data analysis created at Stanford with the needs of historians and other humanists in mind.

Again, we will use prepackaged data for this exercise so that we don’t need to spend time cleaning it – but don’t forget that is a vital part of the process. The two files you’ll need were created by Grinnell College. They’re CSVs relating to 17th century Quakers. Download the quakers_nodelist and quakers_edgelist here: http://vivero.sites.grinnell.edu/files/. These files accompany a short tutorial found here: https://2018bootcamp.vivero.sites.grinnell.edu/tutorials/network-analysis/network-analysis-palladio/.

Examine the CSVs once you’ve downloaded them – you can open them in Excel, Google Sheets, Numbers for Mac, LibreOffice Calc, or any other software you use to work with spreadsheets. Since we didn’t make this data, it’s important to examine it and see what is there, what might be missing, and whether there are any potential problems. Looking it over, get a feel for the data, You may ask the questions posed in the tutorial, such as: What types of historical figures are represented? How are they described in the nodelist data? What additional questions do you have about the individuals who will be represented as nodes? How is the edgelist data structured? Based on a preliminary scan of the nodelist and edgelist CSV data, what types of networks do you think this data might illuminate? Are there gaps, silences, or alternative networks that are not accounted for in the data?

Now take a look at that data in Palladio – follow the instructions to upload your data and view it as a network graph.

Recorded lab session: https://temple.zoom.us/rec/share/UWDrm4AdheHfN6DFigRimQ1fXEMtS6KUrplIExA-KG0MdihVUAFD35D6J0WBIxPR.36IblsRvPuZI_xqN

Week 8: Narrative maps with StoryMapJS

StoryMapJS is a free, browser-based tool that allows for relatively simple creation of narrative maps. Narrative maps add dimensions – temporal, spatial, contextual – that can be powerful tools for storytelling. With the interactive StoryMapJS tool, we can enhance the story we tell by embedding or integrating a variety of rich multimedia source material and easily share the end product. I won’t demo this today, but this tool also has a feature that will let you import a custom “basemap,” such as those you can find in the georeferenced David Rumsey Historical Map Collection.

Preparation: Identify a place in Philadelphia that has historical significance to you, personally. Gather the following information and email it to me:

  • the location (you may need to Google for the closest physical address, but do your best)
  • a headline
  • text/content for the content box (i.e. why is this site interesting or significant to you?)
  • one piece of media (images, URLs for video/audio) and any credits and captions needed

We’ll only take 15 minutes for this process, so don’t stress about perfection. I’ll then walk us through the process of creating a collaborative narrative map. StoryMapJS doesn’t allow multiple people to be logged in at the same time, so I’ll use my account to create the map. I’ll call on you alphabetically to talk about your site as I add it to our StoryMap.

Week 11: Digital storytelling in five frames

Effective digital storytelling incorporates multiple media and technologies to engage audiences with a narrative. This interplay of materials can enhance the transmission of ideas and emotions, and enrich possibilities for complex meaning-making and storytelling. We’ll be engaging in facilitated storytelling within a framework established by a long-running community of Flickr users, Tell a Story in Five Frames. We’ll be utilizing images made freely available by cultural institutions on that site to construct evocative stories based on primary source photographic evidence (a form of remixing). You’ll then present that story to your classmates using Google Slides or another presentation software of your preference.

You can view an example story here that uses images from the Library of Congress.

Preparation: This is a small group activity, so each student must be signed into the Zoom instance so that we can divide into breakout rooms. This lab session will not be recorded.

To complete this assignment:

You will choose a sequence of up to five photos that tell a story visually, as a whole. The subject matter is your choice, with the limitation that you’ll be sourcing images from the Flickr collections of cultural heritage institutions (Namely: The U.S. National Archives, The Library of Congress, The Smithsonian Institution, and The New York Public Library).

  1. Each group will be assigned one of the above Flickr collections to work with. As a group, browse through the images, which are often contained in Albums or Galleries. You can also search within the collection: Click on Photostream, and then the magnifying glass icon. Choose a subject or theme to tell a story using images in your assigned collection. (Small and/or simple ideas will be easiest to execute within our time constraints.)
  2. Choose up to five images that express the story’s theme or subject. You may (but are not required to) refer to Syd Field’s Three-Act Structure or other forms of dramatic structure to help you in constructing an ordered narrative.
  3. Choose an evocative and/or informative title for your story. Aside from attributions, the title will be the only textual element to guide your story. Try to get the point across with the images alone in the context of your story’s title.
  4. Download your images and make a note of the attribution. It’s easy to download images from Flickr; simply choose a photo, click on it, and click the indicated symbol:
  5. Create a presentation of your story construction in Google Slides or another presentation software of your choice. Paste or insert the images you chose in the order you want them presented. Create an introductory slide with the title you’ve chosen. Upload this presentation to the Google Drive or email it to me.
  6. Present your story to your classmates. Share your screen, or ask me to pull up your presentation on my computer.

assignments/care

Collegiality + Care (5% of final grade)

Summary

There are so many reasons why this semester will likely be tough on any and all of us. You, me, or any of your classmates may be struggling with uncertainty, precarity, grief or anxiety at any given moment. So: what I am asking of you is that you do your best to show yourselves, and each other, kindness, understanding, and generosity for the next few months. Help somebody out with a technical issue if you can. Do something nice for yourself. This is an assignment, and I’m giving you an A+ up front trusting that you’ll try your best to complete it. I promise to do my best, too.

assignments/group

Group Project Assignments (15% of final grade)

Summary

These assignments are intended to fulfill the course goal:

  • Discover how to use digital projects to engage with multiple stakeholders and audiences and encourage conversations and collaborations

Collaboration is key to work in digital history. This semester, we will contribute to a campus memory project created in conjunction with colleagues in the Temple Public History program.

Platform

We’ll use Omeka S to create an interface for the project and the three (physical) sites of memory on Temple’s campus. Each student has been assigned an account to use Temple’s Omeka S instance, which is administered by the LCDSS.

Login to your Omeka S account here using the credentials assigned to you: https://lcdssgeo.com/omeka-s/login

Resources

Any collaborative documents will be stored in the Campus Memory Project materials folder of our Shared Google Drive. Feel free to add stuff!

We’ll also be using Miro to wireframe and test out initial site layout/structure ideas. Those whiteboards can be found in our DH@Temple2021 Miro team dashboard.

Content + Structure

This book is a good guide to the general compositional organization of an exhibition (the focus is on physical exhibits, but many of the same principles apply to digital ones). Especially helpful are: “Chapter 3 – Types of Interpretive Labels in Exhibitions,” “Chapter 7 – The Number of Words,” “Chapter 12 – Modalities,” “Chapter 13 – Making Words and Images Work Together,” and “Chapter 15 – Labels for Interpretive Exhibits.”

Design + Accessibility

Meeting Notes

Deliverables + Deadlines

assignments/practica

Skillbuilding + Practica Assignments (30% of final grade)

Summary

These assignments are intended to fulfill the course goal:

  • Evaluate and critically assess digital methodologies and tools through hands-on technical experimentation and skillbuilding

I want you to gain practical DH experience in this class. I also recognize that you may be more interested in some topics than others. We’ll walk through some methods and tools together in class, during our “lab.” If a topic interests you, you can choose to demonstrate your understanding beyond the classroom with a practicum assignment. Each of these practica will be worth 10% 15% of your grade. You will complete 3 2 of them, for a total of 30%.

Rubric

A – Successful achievement/creation of (all of the) intended end-product(s) of an assignment OR a critical assessment of why it didn’t turn out the way you intended. Substantive reflection on the process, tools used, data/sources involved, and result. Insight into how this experience can be applied in the future. Sought guidance from classmates and instructor via group email or in-class lab if difficulties or confusion arose while working on the assignment.

B – Successful achievement/creation of only part of the intended end-product(s) of an assignment, little assessment of why it didn’t turn out the way you intended. Substantive reflection on the process, tools used, data/sources involved, and result. Insight into how this experience can be applied in the future. Sought some guidance from classmates and instructor via group email or in-class lab if difficulties or confusion arose while working on the assignment, but did not follow through. 

C – Successful achievement/creation of only part of the intended end-product(s) of an assignment, no critical assessment of why it didn’t turn out the way you intended. Surface-level reflection on either the process, tools used, data/sources involved, or result. Minimal insight into how this experience can be applied in the future. Did not seek guidance from classmates and instructor via group email or in-class lab if difficulties or confusion arose while working on the assignment.

Revise & Resubmit–No evidence of any of the above criteria. I will ask you to revise and resubmit the assignment.

Possible Assignments

Textual Analysis

Choose a tool:

🌶 Distant Reader, Constellate, or HathiTrust Research Center

🌶🌶 MALLET and the Topic Modeling Tool GUI, AntConc, or NLTK

  1. Pick a corpus or corpora
  2. Install or load tools as necessary
  3. Explore your results!
  4. Answer the following questions and post them in the “text entry” box of this assignment: Where did your data come from? Why did you choose to analyze it with this method? What did you want to find out from the data? What did you actually find out? What would you do differently next time? [Insert any other insights, too]
  5. Take a screenshot or copy the link to your results and submit that to this assignment.

Due on or before 4PM, November 22.

Data visualization

🌶 Interactive Timeline with TimelineJS

Timelines are a tried-and-true tool for historians to show change over time. Although they have limitations – in particular, a strict linearity that may suggest causation – they can be a useful teaching/learning tool or way to add temporal context to a complex or unfamiliar set of events. TimelineJS is a free, browser-based app created by the folks at Knight Lab at Northwestern University that creates interactive, multimodal timelines that can be embedded into web pages.

To complete this assignment:

1. Copy the template Google Sheet and populate the rows with events and images, links, videos, or other media that you’d like to display (for this assignment, include a minimum of ten events).

2. Following the instructions in the Knight Lab site walkthrough for steps 2 and 3, “publish” your template spreadsheet to the web and paste it into the form to generate your timeline.

3. Edit or adjust as needed, and title the timeline.

4. Answer the following questions and post them in the “text entry” box of this assignment:

Where did your data come from? Why did you choose to analyze it with this method? For what applications might you use this tool or others like it?

5. Submit the link generated in step 4 of the Knight Lab walkthrough to this assignment.

Finished product example:

Mapping A World of Cities made by the Leventhal Map and Education Center at the Boston Public Library

Embedded about halfway into this CNN article: https://www.cnn.com/2016/04/20/asia/north-korea-restaurant-defectors/index.html

Video walkthrough: (Via Knight Lab)

Due on or before 4PM, November 22.

🌶 🌶 Network visualization (chord diagram) with Flourish

Network visualizations show connections and interrelationships between entities. A visually-interesting way to represent a small dataset containing this kind of information is with a chord diagram (larger or very complex datasets are better represented with a network diagram). We’ll be using a free tool called Flourish to make an interactive visualization of this kind; in the walkthrough video below, I’ll be using information about correspondence between some of the Founding Fathers.

To complete this assignment:

1. Find or create a CSV file in Excel, Google Sheets, or LibreOffice Calc amenable to interpretation in this way. (See the video below for help making this dataset).

2. Upload this CSV into the Flourish interface using the Chord Diagram template, add a title, and make any cosmetic changes you wish.

3. Publish and/or export the finished product as an HTML file, image file, or embeddable link.

4. Answer the following questions and include them in the text entry box below:

Where did your data come from? Why did you choose to analyze it with this method? What did you want to find out from the data? What did you actually find out? What would you do differently next time?

5. Submit your exported visualization to this assignment.

Finished product example:

https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/3641990/ (interactive version here)

Video Walkthrough

Due on or before 4PM, November 22.

🌶 🌶 Racing bar/column graph with Flourish

Sometimes you just have to show a comparison in your data. Bar and column charts are a great option for visualizing proportional, categorical relationships. They’re relatively simple, but can be very effective. A newer and more visually-interesting way to represent a small-to-medium dataset containing this kind of information is the “racing” bar chart (also called a bar chart race) that dynamically shows comparisons with the added axis of change over time. We’ll be using a free tool called Flourish to make a visualization of this kind; in the walkthrough video below, I’ll be using data from the Social Security Administration about the most common names listed on Social Security Applications, organized by date of birth.

To complete this assignment:

1. Find or create a CSV file in Excel, Google Sheets, or LibreOffice Calc amenable to interpretation in this way. (See the video below for help making this dataset.) You must have a spreadsheet structure that resembles this:

**Title conveying contents of column**Optional category markers
 
**One event/time-based comparison e.g. 1994 Olympic Games** A second event/time-based comparison e.g. 1998 Olympic Games**Optional other event/time-based  comparisons —> e.g. 2002 Olympic Games
Rows containing at least two things to be compared over time (like people, places, things) e.g. Italy [name of country]e.g. Basketball [Category name]Quantitative value to be compared e.g. 10 [number of gold medals]Quantitative value to be compared e.g. 15 [number of gold medals]Quantitative value to be compared e.g. 18 [number of gold medals]
  e.g. Indonesia [name of country]  e.g. Tennis [Category name]e.g. 4 [number of gold medals]e.g. 2 [number of gold medals]e.g. 7 [number of gold medals]

2. Upload this CSV into the Flourish interface using the Bar Chart Race template, add a title, and make any cosmetic changes you wish.

3. Publish and/or export the finished product as an HTML file, image file, or embeddable link.

4. Answer the following questions and include them in the text entry box below:

Where did your data come from? Why did you choose to analyze it with this method? What did you want to find out from the data? What did you actually find out? What would you do differently next time?

5. Submit your exported visualization to this assignment.

Finished product example:

https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/3850710/ (interactive version here)

Video Walkthrough

Due on or before 4PM, November 22.

🌶🌶 Advanced Networks with Gephi

Due on or before 4PM, November 22.

Mapping

🌶 Mapping with Google MyMaps

Google MyMaps is a browser-based location mapping tool built on the GoogleMaps API. It’s not as flashy as some other mapping tools, but it is relatively easy to use as well as to share and embed the finished product. This makes it ideal not only for spatial organization in your research process, but for creating a quick, shareable web map for teaching or interpretation purposes.

Preparation: You can make maps with Google MyMaps in two ways. You can manually search for and add points, or you can do that work ahead of time in a CSV (spreadsheet) and import it into the web interface. If you want to go the latter route, make sure that your data is structured like so:

**Title conveying what’s in the column**Title conveying what’s in the column (e.g. Photo)**Title conveying what’s in the column (e.g. Place descriptor)**Title conveying what’s in the column (e.g. Text blurb)
Latitude/longitude OR Address OR Place names (e.g. Genoa, Italy)(This column not required)(This column not required)(This column not required)

The only required column is the one with location information, but you can add as many as you like.

To complete this assignment:

1. Sign into MyMaps with your Google account and create a map. In the map legend, choose the “Base map” that you would prefer.

2. Gather a list of at least eight points of interest that you want to map.

3. Enter the information into a CSV (Google Sheets is recommended, and it can import directly into MyMaps). Import it as a map layer by choosing “Add layer” in the map legend, and “Import.”

OR

3. Add the points manually. Layers can help you sort the points if you want (categories like “historic sites,” “historic parks,” and “museums” might be helpful).

4. Change anything you might need to. You can draw lines and shapes if you want, customize colors, and pick an icon to represent your point.

5. Answer the following questions and post them in the “text entry” box of this assignment:

Where did your data come from? Why did you choose to analyze it with this method? What did you want to find out from the data? What did you actually find out? How accurate is this representation of place/space? What would you do differently next time? [Insert any other insights, too]

6. In the top center of the map legend, click the “Share” icon to generate a link to your new map. Submit that URL to this assignment.

Finished product example:

A map of areas visited in Italy by Dr. Victor Heiser in 1918, to embed into a blog post about the trip.

Video overview:

Due on or before 4PM, November 22.

🌶🌶 Interactive chloropleth/heat map with Mapbox

Due on or before 4PM, November 22.

Storytelling

🌶 Oral history with Story Corps

StoryCorps is a long-running non-profit oral history/storytelling initiative; you may have seen one of their pop-up recording booths or heard one of their segments on your local NPR station. One of their most popular initiatives is the Great Thanksgiving Listen, “a national movement that empowers young people—and people of all ages—to create an oral history of the contemporary United States by recording an interview with an elder, mentor, friend, or someone they admire.” The organization has also developed an app for iOS and Android devices and a web-based platform called StoryCorps Connect that aim to make it easier for anyone to record, share, and preserve interviews and oral histories.

Preparation:

The interview process itself will only require about 5-40 minutes. Most of the work comes beforehand, as you decide on a person in your life to speak with, prepare questions, practice using the app or the virtual platform, and set up the interview itself.

Some resources and prompts you might find useful during each of these steps:

Identifying someone to interview

Who is one person in your life you would like to learn more about?
Who in your life might find this type of recording meaningful?
What stories or memories are important for you to preserve at this time?

Interviews can be recorded locally using the StoryCorps app or in the virtual world with the StoryCorps Connect platform.

Preparing questions

The StoryCorps app features a “Great Questions” generator to help you pick a topic. Or, check out the Interview Planning sheet, the Great Questions List, some Conversation Tips, or browse through the Stories archive to get some inspiration. People get through an average of six questions during a 40-minute interview, so pick 6-8 questions to have prepared.

Practice using the app or virtual platform

This may require a little bit of time and patience to coordinate, depending on your interviewee’s level of comfort using technology, reliable internet and computer access, or other factors.

If recording virtually with StoryCorps Connect, you may wish to walk through the Getting Started Guide by yourself or along with your interviewee.

A similar User Guide also exists for the StoryCorp App, if you will be making your recording in person.

Setting up the interview

Take some time not only to prepare your questions, but also to prepare your interviewee for the questions you may plan to ask. To familiarize your subject with the project, you might share resources such as the following:

Informational resources like “Make History with StoryCorps” and “Recipes for Success on Interview Day”

A list of a few of the questions you are likely to ask, and the interviewee’s consent to be recorded

Clips of classic StoryCorps interviews like “Clean Streets” or “The Temple of Knowledge”

A brief TEDTalk about the first Great Thanksgiving Listen:

To complete this assignment:

1. Prepare for your interview following the prompts above, and set up either the StoryCorps App or a StoryCorps Connect account. Perform at least one test run recording and upload it to the site to make sure it’s working.

2. Interview day! Remember to Practice Active Listening and keep these Interview Tips in mind.

3. If you and your interviewee so choose, you can upload the recording to be preserved in the American Folklife Center of the Library of Congress.

4. Once you’ve conducted your interview, apply keywords and assign it a title and summary.

5. Debrief by answering the following questions and posting them in the “text entry” box of this assignment:

What was your experience as interviewer: did you encounter any challenges, either with the process, the tech, or the conversation itself? What would you do differently or the same next time? What makes an interview different from a text as a historical reference? Do you think your end product is or could be data?

5. If you are comfortable sharing your completed and uploaded interview, please do so in the URL submission space.

If you are not comfortable sharing the recorded interview, transcribe a question and response you received that you found enlightening, surprising, or meaningful and submit it via the text entry box.

Due on or before 4PM, November 22.

🌶🌶🌶 Interactive, non-linear storytelling with Twine

Twine provides a user-friendly way to create your own interactive digital stories. It takes some practice to maneuver in the interface, requires you to download software onto your computer, and incorporates some (optional) references to languages/scripts used in web design like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. For these reasons, I’ve deemed it 🌶🌶🌶 and provided a number of tutorials and resources to help you as you learn to use this tool.

Preparation:

Download the software from twinery.org and install it onto your computer. It’s compatible with Windows, MacOS, and Linux. The most current version is 2.3.15 – make sure any tutorials you follow or software you download refers to Twine version 2.0+!

Approach this assignment with some idea of the type of story you’d like to tell. Your finished product may be fictional, non-fictional, or a blend of the two; visualizing branching paths of historical contingency can be a huge ordeal, and it may be similar or less overwhelming for you to use a fictional idea, or re-write an existing narrative.

To complete this assignment:

Your completed Twine story should contain, at a minimum:

  • 3 images
  • Colored text
  • A background image
  • 2 endings
  • 20 passages

You will download the HTML file that Twine produces and upload it to the Canvas assignment.

Some tutorials to aid you along the way:

Rewriting an existing narrative in Twine

Introductory slideshow tutorial + accompanying video [transcript] from Cathy Qiu of San Diego State University

Creating a brand-new story in Twine

Step-by-Step Guide to Twine (in Twine) by Jared Zeiders

Twine 101: Creating Your First Project by Kristen Herr, an in-depth tutorial with lots of real examples

A Quick Twine (2.2+) Tutorial by Allison Parrish, with “milestone” exercises

A Total Beginner’s Guide to Twine 2.1 by Adam Hammond of the University of Toronto

Brainstorming

Storytelling in Twine: Processes and Prompts for Inspiration by Tina Lumbis

Branching + conditional statements/contingency

Conditionals slideshow tutorial + accompanying video [transcript] from Cathy Qiu of San Diego State University

Styling your Twine

The Twine Cookbook

Stylizing Your Twine Story tutorial from Cathy Qiu of San Diego State University

Twine 2 Beginners Tutorial Series on YouTube

Due on or before 4PM, November 22.

Interactives/Exhibits

🌶🌶 Interactive tour with Clio

Clio is a nonprofit educational website and mobile application that provides a straightforward interface for creating and editing points (and collections of points, in tours) of historical/cultural interest and making them accessible to the public to explore IRL. It has a number of other useful features, including robust support for use in the classroom and at an institutional level, for historic sites, museums, etc. A few options are reserved for the institutional-type accounts; for instance, you can’t make a virtual tour of several rooms in one museum if you aren’t working with an institutional account. You can, however, create entries and tours for:

  • HISTORIC SITES, MONUMENTS, LANDMARKS, AND PUBLIC ART
    Physical sites that exist in the present. These entries guide the public to an existing monument,
    historical marker, landmark, building, or public space. The entry will offer a concise historical
    interpretation of the site and its significance.
  • MUSEUMS, GALLERIES, AND ARCHIVES
    Historical and cultural institutions. Entries should provide a history of this institution and, if the
    building/location is historic, a history of the building/location as well.
  • TIME CAPSULE
    Time capsule entries explore past places and past events. For structures that no longer exist, the
    entry should be pinned to the specific (or approximate) location of the place, and the construction
    and demolition dates in parentheses after entry name in the title. For past events, the entry
    should be pinned to where the event took place.

You’re going to create (and if it’s close by enough, test out!) a walking or driving tour to access through the Clio app on iOS or Android devices.

Preparation: Come up with an idea for such a tour that would contain at least five points of interest. Don’t know where to start? Here are a few ideas:

(N.B. Your spots don’t need to have any connection to Philadelphia)

To complete this assignment:

1. Log into the Clio website via the “Clio in the Classroom” account I’ve set up for our use (Message me for the password!)

2. Take some time to browse through points of interest that have already been added, and decide if you will need to create new entries or edit existing entries in order to build the tour theme you’re interested in.

3. An entry in Clio is made up of several parts:

  • An Overview (1 paragraph) that offers an objective, descriptive, and compelling overview that helps the reader understand the history and significance of my topic.
  • A Backstory (4-6 paragraphs) that offers readers a historically accurate and detailed narrative on my topic.
  • Images with captions
  • Sources
  • Links

You can create a new entry by clicking the green + “Create new entry” button on the left side menu. You don’t have to create all of your five entries; feel free to use ones that have already been created. Additionally, because we have a classroom account, you will have access to edit pre-existing entries in Clio.

4. Once you’ve made/found/edited a good set of entries, it’s time to make the tour! To do this, navigate to the green + “Create new tour” button on the left side menu. You’ll be prompted to choose between three types of tours: Walking Tour, Driving/Biking Tour, or Thematic Tour/Heritage Trail, with examples of each kind of tour. Go ahead and pick whichever you like.

5. From there, add the sites you’re interested in highlighting to your map. You can drag and drop the entries to change their order. Once you’re finished, click the green “Save your tour” button, and I’ll be notified that you’ve submitted it.

6. Answer the following questions and post them in the “text entry” box of this assignment:

Where did your data/source material come from? Why did you choose to analyze/interpret it with this method? How accurate is this representation of place/space? For what applications might you use this tool or others like it?

(Optional) Test it out (if that’s realistic). Each tour is assigned its own URL, so you can share with others or access it through your own mobile device.

Video overview:

The Clio site has a bunch of solid tutorial videos available, and I recommend taking a gander at them if you get stuck.

Due on or before 4PM, November 22.

User Testing the “In Her Own Right Project” website

The In Her Own Right: A Century of Women’s Activism, 1820 – 1920 project began in 2016 as an inter-institutional effort by PACSCL to bring together and highlight archival collections items from local repositories that reveal stories of women’s activism. The site will be undergoing user testing at the end of October, 2021, and you’re invited to contribute to the process as a practicum assignment.

To complete this assignment:

You’ll receive a survey with questions to answer after browsing the InHOR page and submit your response to organizers in order to help them gauge the site’s navigability, aesthetics, accessibility, content, and structure. Then, provide a brief (250 word maximum) reflection on your experience with the process of user testing, what you may have learned or discovered, and how these insights might inform digital projects of your own making. Submit your answer in the “text entry” box of the assignment.

Notify me if you’d like to participate in this survey by October 18th. Due on or before 4PM, November 22.

Data Management

🌶 Setting up a citation/data management system with Zotero or Tropy

Zotero and Tropy are software tools developed especially for researchers by the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media at George Mason University. These are very handy, especially for graduate students and researchers who often struggle to organize and handle hundreds or thousands of articles, monographs, web resources, archival materials, and more that they need for research. Zotero is a “citation manager” and Tropy calls itself a “research photo manager.” They can be used in conjunction or on their own. I’ll walk through each of them, but it’s up to you whether you choose to use one or both for the assignment.

Preparation:

Zotero requires that you have a collection of published sources (NOT manuscripts or other archival materials). Good examples might be your comps list, or a group of articles to read for a class (or really anything; the sky’s the limit). It doesn’t matter whether these sources are already on your computer or sitting on your desk, because we can enter their information in both ways. Download Zotero to your computer. Navigate to Zotero walkthrough.

Tropy is really good at handling large amounts of archival material that doesn’t fit very well into Zotero or really any other data management systems. Whether you have a collection of photos you’ve taken of archival documents stored on your phone, a neatly sorted series of digital file folders, or just the contents of a finding aid in front of you, Tropy will help you manage those sources. Download Tropy to your computer. Navigate to Tropy walkthrough.

To complete this assignment:

Zotero

1. After you’ve downloaded and installed the software, create a new project by choosing “New Collection” in the File dropdown menu, and name it.

2. Add items into your collection; you’ll want a total of eight or more for the purposes of this assignment. There are several ways to do this:

You can manually add items by click the green New Item button on the toolbar, and choosing the type of document it is. When your item is created, you’ll need to type its identifying information like title and publication date (metadata) into the menu on the right. You can also add notes about the source, assign keyword tags to sort them later, or connect other related documents in the window.

If you have a DOI (Digital Object Identifier), ISBN number, or PubMed ID, Zotero will add the metadata for you automatically. Click the magic wand button on the toolbar to add an item in this way.

Zotero Connector is a free browser extension for Safari, Chrome, and Firefox that allows you to add items directly from the web. (This function doesn’t always work perfectly but it speeds up the process.)

3. You can attach files to objects for easy access. Click the paperclip button on the toolbar to attach a document like a website or PDF to one of your items.

4. It’s easy to sort your sources in Zotero. You can also create subcollections if needed. For now, though, sort the library by Year, ascending (meaning oldest first) by clicking on the Year column.

5. Answer the following questions and post them in the “text entry” box of this assignment:

Where did your data come from? Why did you choose to arrange it with this method? For what applications might you use this tool or others like it? Are there cons to using categorical tools like this one?

6. From Zotero, you can export your library as a spreadsheet (CSV), create a contents report, or generate a bibliography by right-clicking on the collection folder and making your choice. Download this file and turn it in to this assignment.

(Optional) You can also create group libraries to share and crowdsource references online. You’ll need to create an account to do that, but if you choose to, please share the URL with the class! Another bonus to creating an account is that you can access your synched Zotero library from any computer.

Finished product example:

A group library themed around “Consent, Design, and Archives

Video Walkthrough Playlist (via McGill University):

Tropy

1. Once you’ve downloaded and installed the software, select “Create New > Project” in the File dropdown menu, and name it.

2. Tropy will prompt you to drag and drop your research photos or scans. If you don’t have any, you can add items manually by selecting “Create New > Item” in the File dropdown menu. Add at least eight items for the purposes of this assignment.

3. Once you have some items, you’ll need to add their identifying information like author, creation date, archival repository, box number, and more (metadata) via the right pane. You can choose from templates: Dublin Core (an internationally-recognized metadata standard, or schema), Tropy Correspondence, Tropy Generic, and Tropy Item. You’re not required to, but you can also edit, create, import and export your own metadata templates to suit your individual needs.

4. If you added photos, you can organize them into unique items by dragging and dropping them on top of one another. You can also sort items into categories for easier retrieval by choosing “File > Create New > List” and then dragging the items into the folder in the left pane.

5. If you added photos, you can double-click the thumbnail in the right pane to reach an interface that allows you to zoom in on your photo and enter transcriptions or notes underneath it. These annotations are fully searchable. Add annotations like this to two of your items, if they have photos and you’re able.

6. Answer the following questions:

Where did your data come from? Why did you choose to arrange it with this method? For what applications might you use this tool or others like it? Are there cons to using categorical tools like this one?

7. When you’re finished creating your archive, you can export it by selecting “File > Export > JSON-LD”. This will download a hierarchical representation of all of the metadata you entered into the archive, rendered in JSON, which is based on Javascript. It’s not meant to be human-readable! Upload that file to the assignment anyway.

(Optional) If you implement plugins, you can also export to Omeka S to make a web exhibit, to a CSV, or to a full ZIP file archive of your items.

Video overview (via Tropy):

Due on or before 4PM, November 22.

🌶🌶 Evaluating your data model with Breve Tools

Due on or before 4PM, November 22.

🌶🌶🌶 Encoding audio files for easy navigation with OHMS

Due on or before 4PM, November 22.

Propose Your Own Practicum

Have you identified a tool and/or dataset that you’re interested in exploring? Propose it in the “text entry” box, and we’ll talk about if it’s a good fit for this assignment. If so, you’ll share a brief summary with the class of your process and findings.

After I’ve given the go-ahead –

To complete this assignment:

You don’t need to have completely finished everything you want to do for this project, and that’s ok. Regardless, though, you’ll need to explain it in a nutshell to the class on or before November 29th. This debrief is all you will need to “turn in” for this assignment!

Debrief Grading rubric

Form of debrief:

You can submit this in one of several ways: present to the class live on November 29th, record your debrief (Screencast-O-Matic is great for this) or compose a blog post and send it to myself and your classmates by November 29th.

If you decide to present (live or prerecorded), your presentation shouldn’t last more than 8 minutes. If you opt for the blog post, it should not be fewer than 500 words (no maximum). Be sure to show your work with screenshots, photos, and other visual aids so we can see what you’re talking about!

Content of debrief:

Your debrief should cover the below points.

  1. Genesis
    • What was your initial idea?
  2. Process: How did you proceed to turn the idea into a project?
    • How did you organize the process? Did you break it into steps?
    • What data/content did you use, and where did you get it?
    • What tools did you use? How was your experience learning or using those tools?
    • What challenges, difficulties, or hurdles did you encounter in the process?
    • Did you change your mind, methodology, or tools at any point during the process? If so, why?
  1. Outcome
    What did you find out?
    • Point to any salient findings
    • What advice would you give another person (or, past you) who was about to start a similar project?
    • Could you use the skills, data, tools, or methodologies from this project in future scholarship/professional situations?
  • What’s the current state of your project?
    • Is it finished, or will you continue to work on it?
    • What are your next steps? (Hint: if you submit it to a conference or publication, that can serve as your “Reflection” assignment!!)

Due on or before 4PM, November 29.

assignments/prep

Class Preparation Assignments (30% of final grade)

Summary

These assignments are intended to fulfill the course goal:

  • Examine evolving theory and major debates within digital humanities and digital history, including issues of transparency, ethics, accessibility, authority, and legitimacy

Readings, Annotations, and Discussion

Readings are assigned weekly and should be completed before each class. We won’t have an extensive discussion of the assigned material during class time; instead, the class will work to collaboratively annotate the readings using the Hypothes.is tool. We will discuss more about Hypothes.is on the first week of class. Readings and annotations will help you prepare for class, understand the stakes and possibilities of various methods and tools in digital scholarship, and deeply engage in dialogues with your classmates. For this reason, they are worth 30% of your grade (or, 2% each week). Occasionally you might be assigned material that is not possible to annotate (like videos, an entire book, etc.) and in these cases you will be asked to contribute to a discussion board prompt on Canvas.

A note on the readings, videos, and other materials:

Each week, you will review a variety of materials that may differ from what you are accustomed to encountering in a graduate-level history course. The assigned materials reflect an assortment of formats and genres including case studies, process documents, “grey literature,” artistic creations, recorded talks, blog entries, and formal or informal discussions of methods and/or tools. In addition, the creators of these works will come from an array of disciplinary and professional backgrounds which may be unfamiliar to you.

In reviewing these items, I ask that you:

  • Consider the context in which the material was published or presented. An article from the International Journal of Communication, for example, may not (and should not be expected to) answer all of your historiographical questions.
  • Recognize that it’s easy to levy criticism, undirected outrage, and sactimonious dismissal toward projects, problems, and strawmen. Proposing or pointing to concrete solutions is a much more constructive tactic and will serve you more fruitfully in your professional pursuits.
  • Reflect consistently on how you can augment the material’s content and add to an open-minded, solution-oriented group conversation.

Rubric

I would like every student to have the opportunity to participate and share their reactions to a reading or discussion. Quality is more important than quantity. While an individual’s participation will naturally vary from class to class, students are encouraged to improve their participation each class and contribute to class discussion every week. Class preparation will be assessed each class, according to the following rubric:

A – Prepared for every class and familiar with readings and sites for review, contributes questions and discussion points that are not simple reiterations of statements from the readings, makes connections between readings for this class and previous classes, responds to other students’ comments and extends the analysis, analyzes and challenges readings and class discussion in a respectful, evidence-­based manner.

B – Prepared for most classes, engaged listener who contributes but requires occasional prompting, analyzes readings but comments may focus more on restating author’s opinions rather than building upon them with unique statements, respectfully listens to other student comments but does not respond directly to issues they raise.

C – Minimally prepared for classes, does not volunteer comments or questions, provides comments indirectly or not at all connected to the topic when called upon, inattentive listener.

D – No evidence of preparation, cannot provide comments on the subject matter when called upon, disrespectful to other students’ comments, inattentive listener

assignments/reflections

Reflection Assignments (20% of final grade)

Summary

These assignments are intended to fulfill the course goal:

  • Determine how methods of digital history might contribute to the advancement of research interests, scholarship, and professional goals

Every student in this class has different educational interests, needs, and priorities to fulfill. I’d like you to have the freedom to tailor this class to your own, as much as is possible. Choose what works for you. Additionally, the assignment list here is not exhaustive. You are welcome to come up with your own idea for an assignment that involves reflection on how work in the field might relate to you and pitch it to me. You will complete one assignment in this category.

Submit your work via the individual Canvas site links below by 4PM, November 29.

Be prepared to talk briefly about your work to your classmates on the last day of classes, December 6.

Possible Assignments

DH Article Pitch

Due on or before 4PM, November 29. Additionally, be prepared to talk about your work to your classmates for five minutes on the final day of classes, December 6.

Conference or Poster Session Proposal

Identify an upcoming conference, seminar, poster session, etc. and formulate a proposal for it that involves digital history in some aspect. Submit your documents, including a link to the CFP or website where you found the information and proposal requirements.

Due on or before 4PM, November 29. Additionally, be prepared to talk about your work to your classmates for five minutes on the final day of classes, December 6.

Skills Workshop Attendance

Hands-on experience really is the best way to learn how to work with digital tools. There are LOTS of workshops and events offered outside of this classroom — and many of them are free-of-cost to attend remotely. Even better, you can get credit in this course for attending and reflecting on one of them!

To complete this assignment:

1. Check out the Events calendar I’ve set up for this class to find a topic that you might be interested in. If you find one that isn’t listed on the calendar, run it by me;  but it should be fine with me if you go to one of those, instead.

2. Once you’ve identified your event, make sure to register if necessary and check to see if you might need to prepare anything beforehand (sometimes, you might need to install some software or download a dataset or something along those lines to follow along in the workshop.)

3. Then, make sure to attend it! Take notes along the way to help aid in your reflection process later.

4. Once you’ve done all that, give a review of the workshop/event you attended. This can take the form of a written essay, a video, a screen recorded demo, an infographic, blog post, or just about any other medium you prefer. In your review, briefly explain (in no more than 1250 words/ 10 minutes):

  • The name, date, topic, organizer, and other basic details of the workshop
  • The structure of the workshop: how was it organized (thematically, step-by-step, etc.)? Give details about any processes, lectures, or preparatory work that made up the workshop.
  • How was your experience? Did you learn something new? Were there things that frustrated you, and if so, how did you overcome them (or how might they be overcome next time)?
  • Did you come away with an example/protoytpe/work-in-progress that you can show us?
  • What advice would you give to someone else who might be interested in learning more about this same topic?

Due on or before 4PM, November 29. Additionally, be prepared to talk about your work to your classmates for five minutes on the final day of classes, December 6.

“Transparent” Tutorial or Walkthrough

Due on or before 4PM, November 29. Additionally, be prepared to talk about your work to your classmates for five minutes on the final day of classes, December 6.

Digital History Interview

Is there someone doing interesting digital scholarship in your field or subject specialty? Now’s your chance to meet them! The goal of this assignment is to connect you with someone engaged in the kind of DH work you might want to do. This will help you further explore possibilities for future scholarship, projects, and lines of inquiry. It will aid in pinpointing the particular kinds of skills and data that you may want to focus on or learn more about. And last but not least, it may result in a collaborative partnership or mentorship.

The first step: Identifying your subject
DH is a friendly field where scholars and practitioners are, as a rule, generous with their time and resources. You can learn a lot from others, but you first have to make a connection. If you don’t already have someone in mind, do some reconnaissance work by browsing journals, project websites, social media (especially Twitter), and news articles (DH Resources may help get you started). You can also ask me, any of your other peers or professors, or the Scholars Studio staff for suggestions of who you might want to contact.

The second step: Requesting the interview
“In the biz,” this is called an “informational interview.” You’re reaching out to someone because you want something from them (that is not a job) and you’ll get the best results if you take a polite and succinct approach to initiating contact with them. This isn’t hard, but it does take some finesse. There are lots of templates and guides out there to help — you might find this one useful.

The third step: Performing the interview
Plan what you want to ask about so that you won’t exceed the time span you indicated in your request (if it goes over time because the interviewee wants to keep talking, that’s fine, though). What kinds of things do you want to know about their career path, their digital experience, their scholarship and projects, or their skillsets?

The fourth step: Turning it in
You may choose to record it, if it’s a remote meeting and your interviewee is comfortable with that. Or, if it takes the form of an email conversation or chat, you may edit for clarity and submit it here.

Due on or before 4PM, November 29. Additionally, be prepared to talk about your work to your classmates for five minutes on the final day of classes, December 6.

Digital Project Review

By now, you’ve gained a bit of experience in and understanding of the behind-the-scenes processes of digital history work. Equipped with this knowledge, you now have a chance to critique a project created by someone else. The goal of this review is to provide guidance to potential users and producers of similar digital projects. Your assessment also serves as a contribution to the critical discourse surrounding digital scholarship at large, in an effort to raise the level and quality of work in the field.

Pick one of the “featured projects” from this semester, or another digital history/digital humanities project that corresponds to your interests. Review the project following the guidelines outlined in the Journal of American History and the NCPH Digital History Project Review Guidelines. Your review may take the form of a blog post, a YouTube or video review, a digital exhibit, an oral presentation, etc. or some other type of creative medium (just clear it with me first, please!). The review should be ~500-750 words (if written).

If you’re not sure where to find projects that might be of interest to you beyond the ones we’ve already looked at in class, be sure to check out the DH journals listed on this page for project feature articles, and browse through the nominees and winners of the DH Awards.

Due on or before 4PM, November 29. Additionally, be prepared to talk about your work to your classmates for five minutes on the final day of classes, December 6.

Your Idea Here

Due on or before 4PM, November 29. Additionally, be prepared to talk about your work to your classmates for five minutes on the final day of classes, December 6.